|
How nature generates the mass
"How does the matter get its mass?" The community of the physicists of the whole world has conspired on standard concepts. Other approaches do not have any chance for the time being. The great expectation focuses on the mystery of a hypothetical Higgs-Bosons which shall form itself from two protons by fusion. This would as reported, confirm the Big Bang Theory and it would explain the generating of mass. How other people I am in suspense, what bring the experiments in the LHC in Genf. Will the hypothetical Higgs particle which one in advance seriously or mockingly already calls "God particles" and to which one ascribes God strength? I know nothing about this. However, I know one for certain: "The cause how the mass come in being, cannot answer any miracle particle." In as much as this effect primal takes place on a elementary level, and not first, at a particle with a mass bigger than a proton. At first is valid the discovery: "The whole universe consists solely of radiation"; however, at the end of this script the secondary discovery with the same content is equally valid also. To this there is neither doubt after the theory of one single Big Bang, which shall have formed the totality of all worlds within almost 14 billion years; nor after the theory Ludwig Boltzmanns with many worlds which arose at different times and which are in different development stages. Whether this radiation originates from one single Big Bang or from many now, remains anyone's guess. But the radiation of all frequencies always moves with light speed. Seen from this aspect the radiation does not have any option for corporal physical matter with mass. So, the primal question: What holds the world in its inner together; goes down to it: Which general principle offers for the ever moved radiation nevertheless to stay at the same place: for an ultrashort time, for a short time or for a long time until for an extremely long time; and with it causes the inertia of the mass: beside numerous other attributes? This question was answered by me into the 80s. Excepted of some cautious remarks, this has remained unnoticed. I try at this place once again, my solution in condensed form to suggest: Basis are my two postulates about quantized electromagnetic rays. After that every individual beam (mono ray) is a skein of events in the sense of Erwin Schrödingers.
|