Germany:  Leipzig Book Fair of March 13^th up to 16^th , 2008  A K V Working Group of smaller Publishing Houses
in the Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels

Weiterer Beitrag aus dem Forum: Markus Anonymus’ Story2
From because of universal!  Von wegen universell

Hello Mr. Hartje,

maybe I chose with "irresolutely" the wrong word. I simply don't find it logical:  If one creates a theory and it doesn't check with the known empirical realizations, especially then if it is going about questions, which impose however perfectly. To the memory: I had adduced the direction-dependence of the light-speed and the discontinuous attribute of the light-speed at border surfaces. However, that is no absurd special cases. Of course a good master plan is important, but crucial to the truth content of a theory is and simply remains the accordance with the experiment.
A new theory only then is necessary, if a phenomenon, that was not explained until now, is either explained by it -- here is that not the case apparently --; or if it explains the same results as other theories with more fundamental assumptions. Then, one must really review the results of this theory, however. Which from the confessed qualities of the light in the optics can you explain with your theory?
At least the simplest like reflection, refraction and inflection. One will find nothing to that on your home page; however, that must be the first thing, which one must check at his theory. Why do you refer actually constantly to what Einstein or Planck said someday, as if the statements therefore are automatically true? And actually:  Were there in the last 70 years no clever researchers; because realizations of this time of you don't find attention?
And another comment:  If somebody tells you at book fairs: "Yours sounds logical", however, presumably therefore, because this has not much time, to think over this, which is explained exactly there. If you does experience no consent from physicists -- which mean you with the "snooty East Germans" seemingly --, so this can possibly be, however, also that the theory is not convincing. I don't believe that physicists are conservative per se.

Markus Burghard

markus.burghard@epost.de