|
To whom is of benefit the Final Theory: Spiral-Field-Model? Anonymous original title: Qui bono? Correctly: Cui bono
Hello all together,
However, this whole Light-Theory seems relatively irresolutely to me. If only the field strength which exists at this place (about which field is the talk also always), should be crucial for the speed of light, how do directional-dependent speeds of light declare themselves then, for example, as they are observed with the double-refraction? Or however, why ceased the field suddenly on the edge of the glass; then the light is not slower if it flies past near a medium? Evidently, the author has altogether mixed somehow many different theories colorfully: It is reaching from simple circular-polarized light (anyway these comical "spirals-field-skeins" look exactly like this), until to the String-Theories, where the particles should consist of closed strings, that is not much different than an in itself closed spiral field. To whom it is of benefit that everyone proposes his own theory, without being able to explain any empirical facts through it or it even disagrees with the facts, or, to do at least verifiable forecasts. I think that the light behavior is explained very well by the Quantum Electrodynamics. Someone, whom this theory is too heavy, should seek another hobby as Light-Theories.
Markus Burghard
E-mail: markus.burghard@epost.de
|