|
The title Matter from Caught Light betrays what it is. The locally matter, which us surrounded, is made from light; and that not only in one fictitious sense; but quite directly. How that is to be understood, is expounded on over 200 sides. The topic is not offered as dry scientific treatise but in form of a dialogue of two scientists, which have interest to solve fundamental problems. The dialogue began in the preceding title "Bent Light" - ("GebogenesLicht"), where it is limited itself exclusive on the free radiation. Also here will gone down to the genesis of the quantum mechanics. Numerous notes will quoted of partly famous, partly less famous scientists in the register. To Max Plancks times - and under active participation through himself - the orientation principle of the causality stood in the center of the discussion. Through the laws of the macro mechanics from Isaac Newton, appeared that the nature is exact predetermined. The nature was seemingly only therefore not globally foreseeable for us, because we cannot find out the beginning conditions, which are necessary for a calculation; and because we cannot control after it the numerous details of the relationships in its immense sum. This seduces to look at the nature as a masked 'demon'. A not inviting conclusion, that; even if it is already not frankly recognizably; all event courses are predetermined for all times; and that the personal individual could have any really free leeway at all. The fresh quantum mechanics was welcome; to fight against this 'demon'. Instead that the quantum mechanics would draw a friendlier picture of the nature, the quantum physics also overshooted in much of its conclusions over its aims. The quantum mechanics replaced now the fallacy of an inescapable world event according to the laws of the classic physics by a mix from coincidence and uncertainty; partially even with a tendency to the esoteric. That this irked Albert Einstein, is well known. That however, this interpretation even embarrassed Niels Bohr; and him has persuaded to a clarification, is less known.* At last it are the big difficulties that our thinking has with those conclusions, which are won from the probability calculation. Here, the new world and atom model will intervene: the "spiral-field-model". The new model helps to give an illustrative description from the processes in the quantum universe; those, which one can not to get with usual means of empiricism; caused by a row of reasons. A problem, that was seen already with the emergence of the quantum mechanics; for which however despite intensive effort, no satisfactory interpretation was found in physics and nature science, until now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *) Niels Bohr: „Die Unmöglichkeit, in gewohnter Weise zwischen den physikalischen Erscheinungen und deren Beobachtung zu unterscheiden ... könnte vielleicht auf den ersten Blick aussehen, als ob eine solche Einstellung der Physik gegenüber einer Mystik Platz gäbe, die dem Geiste der Naturwissenschaft widerspricht. Klarheit auf dem besprochenen Gebiet dürfte jedoch ebensowenig wie bei anderen menschlichen Fragestellungen zu erreichen sein, ohne den Schwierigkeiten, die sich bei der Begriffsbildung und der Anwendung der Ausdrucksmittel darbieten, ins Auge zu sehen.“ Atomtheorie und Naturbeschreibung - Vier Aufsätze mit einer einleitenden Übersicht von Niels Bohr Verlag von Julius Springer 1931, site 10
|