|
Foreword for the second edition of “Bent Light”
After the other titles, which meanwhile were written, I come back to those, where all my thoughts came from; before the decline of the GDR. My ambition was utopian, and is it probably still today.
I wanted to mediate between the philosophies, which are arguing. Not through blurred well-meaning words but in that I disclose backgrounds of philosophy and physics, which are responsible for very many misunderstandings, how I thought and think. To my astonishment, this interests nobody until now. Nobody on the one still on the other side. The meanwhile worn officials of the GDR had not perceived my ideas, for the most part. To the other, one didn't want to perceive this probably either. The victorious successors could take up my ideas. But been missing far. Apart aside from groups, which reject my thoughts about ideological reasons, the general interest goes into pragmatic directions. The theoretical nature science generally lost prestige. Nature laws are for some ones a hindrance to the absolute freedom, really. For me, these problems appear significantly more complex, as that one take for true. However, that is - in contrast to the time of Planck, Einstein, Heisenberg, Bohr and others that discussed about it - from the theories of the nature sciences extensive ousts.
The writing was revised by me with the now available means of the computer technology not least in the outer style and was equipped with new originated graphic illustrations. The text however was changed a little only. The fundamental ideas, which meanwhile the new theory names "spiral-field-model" ( or "screw-field-model"), agrees in all points with the origin.
March 2003 (1989/2002) Udo A. J. Hartje
|
